Skip to main content

Next Stop: NONFICTION


Comments

  1. Ok, I gotta ask: what's with the title?? Or is that something that I just have to read to find out myself??

    In all seriousness, this book sounds incredibly fascinating to me personally. My grandmother was diagnosed with dementia several years ago, and every time I go to visit her, I am happy that I did, but still so sad that I have to reintroduce myself each time. Would you consider this book to be emotionally therapeutic for someone who has a loved one dealing with dementia, or is it more informative, giving the reader more information on the issue?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The title is actually explained in the preface material to the actual content; it is a question on a cognitive exam. You can find questionnaires like it in magazines like Reader's Digest, sometimes. It begins with things like the year and the name of the president, then goes on to ask about more complicated things; one of the ones I remember reading was "why would it be difficult to find a pineapple in the desert?" The idea is to show the progression of logical thought, to be able to tell when and why things don't make sense in a context that is not immediate.

      Please accept my condolences for your share in the loss of your grandmother's memories. I may perhaps not be the best person to ask about something being therapeutic--I currently work in a nursing home and most of my residents have dementia. My take on the disease and its effects are not the same as someone who has shared memories, or expectations of what someone was like before their diagnosis. I live in a sort of perpetual-present-moment with them; my perspective on this book is colored by that experience.

      I'm not sure if this book would be therapeutic; I think that would depend on how emotionally ready you are to face death and the effects of dementia. I was deeply affected by the increasing exhaustion and inability to deal with the effects of dementia on a caregiver who is the age of many of my residents; 24/7 caregiving is no small thing.

      This book is not informational, unless you are completely ignorant of dementia and its effects; what I cherish about this book is that Phyllida Law writes with humor, and with honesty about grief. I am glad someone is not afraid to show that living with dementia can be hilariously funny and that people with dementia do not lose their personhood just because they lose their memories or cognitive ability. I find her writing on grief to be... accurate.

      It's definitely worth a read. And it is short. The book has illustrations but Phyllida Law herself reads the audiobook, so you've got choices.

      Delete
    2. Feel free to talk to me about anything related to dementia and loving people who have it; that goes for anybody reading this! No question is too simple or too weird. I even developed an annotated bibliography for caregivers for another class, I have no qualms about sending it out if you need it.

      Delete
  2. Great annotation! This is a book that I've never heard of, but your summary definitely piqued my interest. And I have to echo Zach, what's with the title? Full points!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks! It is an amazing book and I definitely recommend it. She has two more books I'm looking forward to picking up soon:)

      Copied from above:
      "The title is actually explained in the preface material to the actual content; it is a question on a cognitive exam. You can find questionnaires like it in magazines like Reader's Digest, sometimes. It begins with things like the year and the name of the president, then goes on to ask about more complicated things; one of the ones I remember reading was "why would it be difficult to find a pineapple in the desert?" The idea is to show the progression of logical thought, to be able to tell when and why things don't make sense in a context that is not immediate. "

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 11 Prompt

The change from printed book to ebook or audiobook does imply some shift in appeal factors; an ebook is no longer subject to possible restrictions on length because of the heaviness of the book (or portability, whether or not it will fit into a purse), and an audiobook may be limited in its appeal to readers because of the style of the narrator.   This change affects our knowledge of the genre because we can no longer make snap judgments based on the publishing company’s dustjackets, blurbs, or the physical attributes of the book (font, paper type, cover material, etc.) and does not allow for browsing a shelf as easily as has been done in the past. We must learn to browse electronically and make connections through online networks (GoodReads, YouTube, various bloggers, NoveList—just for a few examples!).   The fact that readers are able to change font, line spacing, color, etc. of an ebook could have an effect on the reader’s appeal but I think individual rea...

Week 6 Prompt

I think promoting classic horror at my local library would be fun; integrated advisory would be a snap! It would be possible to do this close to Halloween and make it a seasonal event as well.   We could host a movie night with films already in the public domain; there are several starring Bela Lugosi, Boris Karloff, and Orson Welles on The Internet Archive alone, let alone the more obscure films which might be just as enjoyable. Popcorn and retro candy from the period (Smarties, Necco wafers, Dots etc.) could be serves as refreshments along with rootbeer floats; it could be done fairly cheaply but we could expand it depending on our budget (if we really want to spend money, we could show some of the Universal Classic Monsters films, or do a costume contest with prizes!). If there’s an audience for it, we could talk about the local history of cinema in our town (my town has a *new* drive-in movie theater just this year, but lots of folks remember the old historic movie the...

Week 14 Prompt

Respectfully, I would not shelve them outside of the general collection unless they were being displayed for a specific, temporary function such as a topical or seasonal display. Of course, it would depend on the reasons why the patrons requested the separation: if it was to make the books more easily found by those who would read them, I could suggest an alternate method (making up an annotated bibliography, doing a few blog posts of “So you’re interested in…”, a passive display, etc.). If it was for the purpose of censorship, I could provide the concerned party with a copy of library policy and explain that libraries (and other services subsidized by the federal government) must serve a diverse community.   If the collection is not separated by genre, starting a new system for one subset of books is not appropriate to the organization of the library. We probably—to be perfectly honest—do not have the space to set up a completely different set of shelves for a small su...